Facing an Unfair Decision?

FAIR-DO provides structured analysis for fair governance challenges

When dealing with unjust rulings or procedural violations, the main challenge isn't being right—it's knowing how to articulate it effectively. FAIR-DO is a practical framework that helps "translate" grievances into the precise language of laws and regulations, preventing bureaucratic boilerplate responses.

Main Русский 中文
Operational Analysis
Get a structured framework for specific administrative or compliance issues
Crisis Response [what is this?]
Emergency situations requiring immediate action and risk mitigation
Architecture Research [what is this?]
Discuss, critique, or develop the FAIR-DO governance architecture
Preliminary Analysis (DL: 20%)
Structure the problem and identify key issues
Action Planning (DL: 50%)
Get specific action paths with legal references
Comprehensive Execution (DL: 80%)
Detailed execution plan with risk assessment
Workflow:
1. Select mode & delegation level → 2. Click "Generate Framework" → 3. Copy full content → 4. Paste to AI chat
AI Analysis Framework
Framework not generated. Please select mode and delegation level, then click "Generate Framework".
How to use:
  1. Click "Generate Framework" to create complete instructions
  2. Click "Copy" to copy the entire text
  3. Open AI chat (ChatGPT, Claude, etc.)
  4. Paste the copied text at the beginning of a new message
  5. Immediately after, describe your situation
  6. The AI will analyze using FAIR-DO protocol
How to verify the AI understands the framework?

Send the AI: "Confirm you are operating within the FAIR-DO framework."

A correct response must include:

  • reference to SCoPR or "research support system",
  • the hierarchy "fairness > law > regulation",
  • rejection of technocratic solutions (QR codes, automated fines, location tracking).
Example: How it Works in Practice
A story not about quick wins, but about changing institutional dynamics
  • Situation: Residents received notice of approved construction in a public park. Official response stated hearings "followed proper procedure."
  • Using FAIR-DO analysis:
    • Formal request for complete hearing records and materials
    • Template for collective resident appeal demanding proper hearings
    • Grounds for prosecutor's office complaint regarding procedural violations
  • Result: Prosecutor's office initiated review. Project paused. Issue transformed from "resident-official conflict" to "subject of formal oversight." Administration cancelled decision within weeks, acknowledging procedural issues.

Fair governance begins with asking: "On what basis?"